REVERSED AND BENEFITS AWARDED
A judge cannot reject an IQ test as being too old when there is no evidence that indicates the test was invalid, nor do the test results have to be in the file, the mere reference of them with a showing of inability to pass 9th grade proficiency tests and finding by school of mentally handicapped is sufficient to prove dx of intellectual impairment.
Substantial evidence did not support the ALJ’s decision to disregard Dragon’s examining doctor’s evaluation in favor of a form with little substantive information.
The ALJ found Dragon’s testimony “credible to the extent that such testimony is consistent with the above [RFC] assessment.6 To the extent that any such testimony was reflective of a greater degree of limitations, such testimony was not found to be credible due to a lack of objective medical support.” This reasoning is circular. The ALJ found Dragon’s testimony credible to the extent it confirmed the ALJ’s own conclusion. Thus, it appears the ALJ afforded Dragon’s testimony no weight at all because the ALJ had come to its conclusion independent of the information from her testimony.
United States District Court, D. Idaho.
March 28, 2012.
When taking in account with all the evidence, a claimant’s demeanor and manner at trial is one of several factors an ALJ can use to determine credibility
Case shows the level of functioning in ADHD child found not to meet the definition of disability
REVERSED and REMANDED
With evidence of a IQ below 70 the judge must consider if it is a valid score and whether or not in combination the claimant meets 12.05c